[00:05:13]
[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:05:24]
GOING TO CALL THE SPECIAL CALL MEETING OF JUNE 21 TO ORDER.PLEASE WE HAVE A VERY ABBREVIATED AGENDA THIS EVENING.
HOPEFULLY WE WON'T BE HERE TOO LONG.
THERE HAVE BEEN NO MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA SINCE IT'S BEEN RELEASED, SO I'LL PROVE THE AGENDA.
AND LET'S START BY OBSERVING A MOMENT OF SILENCE, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
[MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE]
OKAY. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STAND AND LET'S PLEDGE THE FLAG.[Changes to Policy GCC Professional Staff Leaves and Absences and Policy GDC Support Staff Leaves and Absences]
SUPPORT STAFF LEAVES AND ABSENCES.NOW TRAY IS THE ONE THAT WE APPROVED A DIFFERENT ONE BY ACCIDENT.
THE VERSION THAT YOU HAVE TONIGHT OF GCC AND GDC JUST REMOVED THAT THAT ERRONEOUS SENTENCE.
I GUESS THE QUESTION I HAD WAS, SINCE WE APPROVED THE ERRONEOUS ONE, DID WE HAVE TO DISAPPROVE IT BEFORE WE CAN MODIFY IT? BECAUSE THAT WAS WAS ON FIRST READING OR SECOND READING.
FIRST READING CAME IN MAY, LAST WEEK WAS SECOND.
WE APPROVED IT ON THE SECOND READING WE MADE IT POLICY, I THINK.
WELL, THAT'S THE ISSUE. JASON, YOU MIGHT CAN HELP US ON THIS, HAVING A LEGAL BACKGROUND.
THERE WAS SOME BY ACCIDENT OLD POLICY WITH SOME WORDING THAT IS NOT IN THE PROPOSED POLICY WAS INCLUDED AND WE APPROVED IT ON SECOND READING.
MY QUESTION IS, DO WE HAVE TO REVOKE THE FIRST ONE? IF SOMEHOW.
IF I MIGHT JUST CLARIFY TOO, IT WAS ONE SENTENCE IN THERE.
IT'S A PRETTY EXTENSIVE POLICY HERE.
HOW ABOUT IF WE MAKE A MOTION TO CORRECT THE ERROR AND APPROVE THE POLICY REVISION ON SECOND READING? WHAT DO YOU THINK? WAS THE SENTENCE ADDED IN THE SECOND READING THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REMOVE? I APOLOGIZE. YES, YES, SIR.
THE SENTENCE WAS IN THE SECOND READING.
WHAT IT IS, IS TALKING ABOUT THE PAYOUT OF SICK LEAVE.
WE THE BOARD CAPPED IT WITH THIS POLICY AT 180 DAYS.
AND WHAT THE ERRONEOUS SENTENCE SAID WAS THAT ANYBODY IN FUTURE YEARS THAT EXCEEDED THAT 180 WOULD BE PAID OUT AT $25 PER DAY, UP TO 15 DAYS.
THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE IN THERE.
WE WANTED TO TAKE THAT SENTENCE OUT IT.
I'M NOT SURE HOW IT GOT IN THERE.
IT WASN'T IN THE FIRST READING AND IT ACTUALLY WAS WAS NEVER DISCUSSED IN HERE.
BUT WE DISCOVERED AFTER THE FACT THAT THAT SENTENCE WAS IN THERE.
SO IT'S ONE SENTENCE EACH AND JUST GCC AND GDC.
SO WE NEVER TECHNICALLY HAD A SECOND READING OF THE MOTION.
I'M JUST TRYING TO RUN THROUGH THE LINGUISTICS OF THIS.
[00:10:01]
I THINK YOUR SOLUTION IS FINE AT THE END OF THE DAY.I MOVE THAT WE CORRECT THE ERROR MADE IN THE POLICY REVISION APPROVED AT THE LAST BOARD MEETING BE CORRECTED AS PRESENTED TO US AND THAT WE APPROVE THE REVISED POLICY ON SECOND READING.
ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.
[Personnel Appointments]
DO YOU HAVE THE LIST? IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? MOVED BY MS. RHINEHART-JACKSON.IT'S THERE A SECOND? SECOND BY DR.
HANKS. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE PERSONNEL SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING PLEASE SIGNIFY BY RAISING YOUR HAND.
WE NEED AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS ANOTHER PERSONNEL MATTER.
[EXECUTIVE SESSION]
ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.WE'RE GOING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
WE'RE RETURNED FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION AFTER DEALING WITH THIS ITEM.
AND WE WILL TAKE ACTIONS AT THAT TIME THAT APPROPRIATE.
[RETURN TO OPEN SESSION]
[ACTION ON ITEMS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION]
[00:21:26]
SAY IT.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.